ADAPTASI INSTRUMEN SELF EFFICACY PENJAGA TAHANAN DI LAPAS KELAS IIA MAGELANG
Abstract
This study aims to adapt a self-efficacy instrument for detention officers at Class IIA Magelang Correctional Facility and evaluate its measurement quality. The study employed a quantitative approach, with data collected through questionnaires administered to 55 respondents. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 through item-total correlation analysis and reliability testing using Cronbach’s Alpha. The preliminary analysis of eight items showed Corrected Item-Total Correlation values ranging from 0.749 to 0.934. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was estimated at 0.964 based on the available statistics, indicating very high internal consistency. However, these findings alone are insufficient to establish the overall validity of the instrument. Content validity assessment through expert judgment, along with an evaluation of construct relevance and the adaptation procedures, is necessary to obtain more comprehensive evidence. This study is expected to produce a self-efficacy instrument that is appropriate for the work context of detention officers and can serve as an adequate measurement tool for future research.
References
Azwar, S. (2013). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Pustaka Pelajar.
Balsan, L. A. G., Carneiro, L. L., Bastos, A. V. B., & Costa, V. M. F. (2020). Adaptação e Validação da Nova Escala Geral de Autoeficácia. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(4), 409–419.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. SPINE, 25(24), 3186–3191.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83.
Das, S. K., Philip, M., Sudhir, P. M., & VS, B. (2024). Psychometric Evaluation of Schwarzer & Jerusalem’s General Self-Efficacy Scale Among Indian Adolescents. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 6, 1–19.
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory And Applications. SAGE Publications.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Annabel Ainscow.
Hanh, T. T. H., Thanasilp, S., & Pudtong, N. (2024). Psychometric properties of the New General Self-Efficacy Scale for Vietnamese persons with colorectal cancer. Belitung Nursing Journal, 10(5).
Keinan, G., & Malach-Pines, A. (2007). Stress And Burnout Among Prison Personnel: Sources, Outcomes, and Intervention Strategies. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 34(3), 380–398.
Lidya, H., Noviana, U., Haryani, Alim, S., & Setiyarin, S. (2024). Validity And Reliability Of The Indonesian Version Of General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) With Disasters. Journal of Language and Health, 5(2), 708–716.
Novrianto, R., Marettih, A. K. E., & Wahyudi, H. (2019). Validitas Konstruk Instrumen General Self Efficacy Scale Versi Indonesia. Jurnal Psikologi, 15(1), 1–9.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Pemasyarakatan, D. (2015). Tugas Penjagaan pada Lapas dan Rutan. Ditjenpas. https://www.ditjenpas.go.id/tugas-penjagaan-pada-lapas-dan-rutan
Peraturan Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengamanan Pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dan Rumah Tahanan Negara, 1 (2015).
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 1999 Tentang Syarat-Syarat Dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Wewenang, Tugas Dan Tanggung Jawab Perawatan Tahanan, 1 (1999).
Putri, A. H., Rohimah, N., Elizafitriani, A., & Merdiaty, N. (2025). Model Stres Kerja dan Dampaknya pada Produktivitas: Analisis Literatur. Observasi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Psikologi, 3(1), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v3i1.962 (doi.org in Bing)
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261.
