Analisis Implementasi Perencanaan Pembelajaran Berbasis Pembelajaran Mendalam dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Kurikulum Merdeka
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of deep learning-based instructional planning in improving student learning outcomes in the Merdeka Curriculum. Deep learning is an approach that emphasizes conceptual understanding, critical thinking skills, and active student engagement in the learning process. The research method used in this study is library research by examining various relevant literature sources, including books, scientific journals, and supporting documents. The results of the study indicate that systematically designed instructional planning through the formulation of objectives based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), the use of active learning models, and the application of authentic assessment can improve students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning outcomes. In addition, deep learning encourages students to become more active, creative, and capable of solving problems during the learning process. However, its implementation still faces several challenges, such as limited teacher understanding, limited instructional time, and inadequate supporting facilities. Therefore, teacher training, development of teaching modules, utilization of technology, and collaboration among teachers are needed to optimize and sustain the implementation of deep learning in improving the quality of education.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.
Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox. North Central College.
OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
