PERAN PEMBIMBING KEMASYARAKATAN DALAM KONSTRUKSI KEPATUHAN KLIEN PEMBEBASAN BERSYARAT DI BALAI PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS I MATARAM
Abstract
Compliance among parolees is often reduced to whether they show up for scheduled reporting. This article treats it instead as a social process that develops through the relationship between clients, their Community Supervisors (Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan, PK), and the wider social setting. A descriptive qualitative study was carried out at the Class I Correctional Center (Bapas) of Mataram with four PK and two parolees selected purposively. Data came from semi-structured in-depth interviews and document review, were analysed with the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, and were checked through source triangulation. The findings were read through Hirschi’s social control theory, Berger and Luckmann’s social construction of reality, Tyler’s work on legitimacy, and Trotter’s model for working with involuntary clients. Compliance appeared to move through stages, from reporting out of obligation, to growing understanding of the obligation, to self-initiated contact with the supervisor; only some clients reach the last stage. Supervisors build trust from the pre-release social inquiry, use personal approaches, monitor clients periodically, involve them in guidance programmes, and try to instil belief in the norms. Their influence is strongest on attachment, while commitment and involvement remain limited because skills training rarely leads to employment. Compliance is shaped by personal determination, emotional control, peer environment, family support, access to work, stigma, and institutional limits, including a caseload of about 65 clients per supervisor across the whole island of Lombok. Clients came to see reporting as an obligation that gradually felt useful, although this rests on two interviews and should be read as preliminary.
References
Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Mataram. (2026). Laporan harian Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Mataram, 20 Agustus 2026 [Dokumen internal tidak dipublikasikan]. Mataram: Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Mataram.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Bottoms, A. E. (2001). Compliance and community penalties. In A. E. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe, & S. Rex (Eds.), Community penalties: Change and challenges (pp. 87–116). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Faradisa, S. A., Anwar, U., Priyatmono, B., & Muhammad, A. (2025). Peran komunikasi interpersonal pembimbing kemasyarakatan dalam meningkatkan motivasi klien untuk mengikuti program pembimbingan di Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas II Wonosari. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 3130–3139.
Fazel, S., & Wolf, A. (2015). A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: Current difficulties and recommendations for best practice. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130390
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kennealy, P. J., Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M., & Eno Louden, J. (2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 496–505.











