DYNAMIC SECURITY DALAM MITIGASI KONFLIK ANTARKELOMPOK ETNIS DI RUTAN KELAS I BANDUNG
Abstract
Individual disputes in detention can escalate when associated with group solidarity and perceived unfairness. This study analyses dynamic security practices for mitigating interethnic group conflict at Bandung Class I Detention Centre and their supporting and constraining factors. A descriptive qualitative approach was used, drawing on in-depth interviews with ten purposively selected informants, comprising eight staff members and two detainees. Data were analysed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña through data condensation, display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings indicate that regional friendships can support adjustment but may restrict social interaction when accompanied by group pressure. Reported dynamic security practices include professional communication, fair services, recognition of behavioural changes, information verification, coordination between shifts, and follow-up after tensions. Leadership guidance, information sharing, detainee trust, and shared activities supported implementation. Crowded accommodation, surveillance limitations, workload, rumours, and uneven documentation constrained continuity. Professional relationships therefore require consistent rules and clear complaint follow-up. Detainees’ perceived safety should inform evaluation alongside visible order. The study clarifies the relationship between service fairness, information disclosure, and continuity of conflict management. The findings describe interview-based practices rather than establish a causal reduction in conflict.
Keywords: dynamic security; intergroup conflict; service fairness; early detection; detention centre
References
Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct: A longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550710
Day, A., Newton, D., Cooke, D., & Tamatea, A. (2022). Interventions to prevent prison violence: A scoping review of the available research evidence. The Prison Journal, 102(6), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855221136201
Day, A., Tamatea, A. J., Butcher, L., Daffern, M., Cooke, D., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2026). “Taller fences or longer tables”: Should we rely on dynamic security to prevent prison violence? The Prison Journal, 106(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855251413754
Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 8 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Keamanan dan Ketertiban pada Satuan Kerja Pemasyarakatan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/285153/permenkumham-no-8-tahun-2024
Kilmer, A., Abdel-Salam, S., & Silver, I. A. (2023). “The uniform’s in the way”: Navigating the tension between security and therapeutic roles in a rehabilitation-focused prison in Norway. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221143536
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://study.sagepub.com/miles3e
Prakoso, A., Suwartiningsih, S., & Utomo, A. W. (2024). Proses interaksi antar narapidana di Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas IIB Salatiga. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(3), 5126–5137. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10824
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/218804/uu-no-22-tahun-
Subroto, M., & Pamuna, R. D. (2024). Pendekatan dynamic security terhadap WBP lansia di Lapas Kelas 1 Sukamiskin. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(5), 3319–3329. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15368
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2015). Handbook on dynamic security and prison intelligence. United Nations. https://www.europris.org/wp-content/uploads/ep_library/UNODC_Handbook_on_Dynamic_Security_and_Prison_Intelligence.pdf
