HUBUNGAN PENELITIAN SEBAGAI DASAR PENGEMBANGAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN
Abstract
Research relationships play an important role in the development of science and evidence-based decision making. In scientific studies, the relationship between variables becomes the main foundation for understanding phenomena systematically and logically. This study aims to analyze the role of research relationships in supporting scientific development and decision making in various fields. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach with a library research method through the study of books, journals, and relevant scientific literature. The results of the study indicate that research relationships, both causal, correlational, and descriptive, contribute significantly to building scientific concepts, strengthening theories, and producing accurate information for decision making. In addition, understanding research relationships also supports the preparation of more systematic research methodologies and improves the validity of scientific findings. Therefore, research relationships become an important element in the advancement of science and in determining policies and solutions based on scientific data.
References
Abdussomad. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV. Syakir Media Press.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: Pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Farida, N., Pangestuti, S. M., Prihatini, Y., & Mahardika, I. K. (2024). Kebenaran ilmiah dalam perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Paradigma: Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Budaya, 30(2), 21–29.
Fauzi, I. M., Syukri, A. S., & Arifullah, M. (2026). Relevansi filsafat ilmu dalam pengembangan pengetahuan kontemporer. Al-Mujahadah: Islamic Education Journal, 3(2), 63–73.
Gole, S., Sinring, A., & Kamaruddin, S. A. (2025). Pengembangan teori ilmiah berbasis filsafat ilmu: Pendekatan interdisipliner dalam studi resonansi, teknologi, dan perkembangan manusia. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 6(4), 1691–1702.
Kerlinger, F. N. (2006). Asas-asas penelitian behavioral. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Mareta, A., Fitrisia, A., & Fatimah, S. (2024). Berpikir teoritis dalam ilmu pengetahuan: Fondasi teori ilmiah dan implikasinya. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 4(4), 227–234.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nazir, M. (2018). Metode penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Repko, A. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. SAGE Publications.
Romlah, Riniyati, Ruswanto, Sumardi, E., Wardati, U., & Sobirin. (2026). ORIENTASI DAN EKSPEKTASI METODE PENELITIAN KOMUNIKASI. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(02), 202 - 211. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.12932.
Sentosa, P. (2020). Hubungan korelasional dalam penelitian sosial. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian, 5(2), 45–53.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Yusuf, A. M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan penelitian gabungan. Prenada Media.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociological theory (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (2009). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
