ANALISIS KONSEP DAN IMPLEMENTASI TAFSIR TARBAWI SEBAGAI LANDASAN PENDIDIKAN QUR’ANI

  • Arif Atma Mahendra UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Darul Mustofa UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Ainal Gani UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Muhammad Akmansyah UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Amirudin UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Keywords: Tafsir Tarbawi, Islamic Pedagogy, Qur'anic Interpretation

Abstract

This study examines the concept and scope of tafsir tarbawi as a Qur’anic interpretive approach that emphasizes educational values, character formation, and the development of human potential based on divine guidance. The problem addressed in this article is the lack of comprehensive understanding regarding how educational principles in the Qur’an can be systematically extracted through tafsir tarbawi and applied to contemporary Islamic education. The purpose of this study is to identify the essential concepts of tafsir tarbawi, outline its theoretical foundations, and explain its relevance to current educational challenges. This research employs a qualitative library research method, analyzing classical and contemporary tafsir works as well as literature on Islamic education. The analysis reveals that tafsir tarbawi focuses on extracting pedagogical values from Qur’anic verses, including principles of faith education, moral cultivation, character development, balance between worldly and spiritual aspects, and dialogical methods in teaching. Furthermore, the study highlights key educational principles embedded in the Qur’an, such as tauhid as the foundation of education, exemplary behavior as a method of value internalization, wisdom and dialogue as pedagogical approaches, and holistic human development as the ultimate goal. The findings indicate that tafsir tarbawi provides a strong epistemological basis for constructing a comprehensive Islamic education framework that integrates cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions. Therefore, tafsir tarbawi is highly relevant for responding to modern educational challenges, strengthening Islamic identity, and shaping a generation with strong character, spiritual depth, and intellectual competence. Overall, this study affirms the importance of tafsir tarbawi as a strategic approach in grounding educational practices in Qur’anic principles.

References

Al-Ghazali, M. (2022). Pendidikan karakter dalam perspektif Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Brabender, V., & Fallon, A. (2009). Group development in practice: Guidance for clinicians and researchers on stages and dynamics of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Creswell, J. W. (2020). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fariq, A. (2011). Perkembangan dunia konseling memasuki era globalisasi. Pedagogi, 2(1), 255–262.
Hanafi, A. (2021). Metodologi studi Islam: Pendekatan teks dan konteks. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hodgson, J., & Weil, J. (2011). Commentary: How individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(1), 1–3.
Lyznicki, J. M., Young, D. C., Riggs, J. A., Davis, R. M., & Dickinson, B. D. (2001). Obesity: Assessment and management in primary care. American Family Physician, 63(11), 2185–2196.
Nurdin, M. (2023). Analisis isi dalam penelitian pendidikan Islam: Konsep, langkah, dan penerapannya. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Modern, 5(2), 134–148.
Rahman, A. (2020). Urgensi literatur mutakhir dalam penelitian kualitatif pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 12(1), 77–89.
Shihab, M. Q. (2024). Tafsir nilai-nilai pendidikan dalam Al-Qur’an: Pendekatan tematik dan tarbawi. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
Universitas Terbuka. (2008). Agustin, M., & Syaodih. Bimbingan konseling untuk anak usia dini. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Published
2025-12-21
How to Cite
Mahendra, A. A., Darul Mustofa, Ainal Gani, Muhammad Akmansyah, & Amirudin. (2025). ANALISIS KONSEP DAN IMPLEMENTASI TAFSIR TARBAWI SEBAGAI LANDASAN PENDIDIKAN QUR’ANI. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 11(04), 254 - 265. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v11i04.9694