PERSEPSI GURU TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN CHATGPT SEBAGAI ASISTENSI MENGAJAR GURU DI SMPS PERTIWI SITEBA KOTA PADANG
Abstract
This study aims to determine teachers' perceptions of the use of AI, particularly ChatGPT, as a teaching aid by teachers at SMPS Pertiwi Siteba in Padang City. Based on observations at SMPS Pertiwi Siteba Padang City, a phenomenon was found regarding the adoption of AI among teachers, where teachers utilize ChatGPT in various ways, such as preparing lesson plans, as a source of instant information, reviewing teaching materials, and so on. The problem lies in the fact that the use of ChatGPT by teachers is still not restricted due to the absence of a guidebook and specific rules regarding AI among junior high school teachers and their equivalents. This is important because without clear guidelines for teachers on how to use ChatGPT, teachers will use it according to their teaching needs based on their individual perceptions, which will ultimately determine how teachers make decisions and act at school. Therefore, it is necessary to measure descriptively how teachers perceive the use of AI innovation as an assistance in their teaching. This research is descriptive quantitative research using the Likert scale analysis technique with a questionnaire instrument that has 35 statements and 5 alternative answers, namely Strongly Agree (SS), Agree (S), Doubtful – Doubtful (D), Disagree (D), and Strongly Disagree (SD). This study was conducted on 30 respondents who were active teachers at SMPS Pertiwi Siteba, Padang City. The results of the study show that the use of ChatGPT as an assistant is in the “High” category in terms of utilization, and the overall percentage reaches 79.96%, which is in the “Good” category. Thus, teachers' perceptions greatly impact how ChatGPT is used as a teaching assistant.
References
Azwar, Saifuddin. 2010. Sikap Manusia Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly Journal, 13(3), 319–340.
Dwihadiah, D., Gerungan, A., & Purba, H. (2024). Penggunaan ChatGPT di kalangan mahasiswa dan dosen perguruan tinggi Indonesia. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(2), 130–145.
Hagendoff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120.
Mukhlis, M. (2024). Persepsi Guru terhadap Pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam Mengembangankan Soal Literasi Membaca : Studi Kasus pada Sekolah Menengah di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 1 – 19.
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Artificial intelligence and its role in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), Article 22.
Robbins, S. P. (2015). Perilaku organisasi (Edisi ke-16). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Rosi, Rois I. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Education: Pros and Cons Among Secondary School Teachers in Malang, Indonesia Proceeding International Conference on Islamic Education. Diperoleh dari: https://conferences.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/icied/article/view/3130
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syafril. (2010). Statistika. Padang: Sukabina Press
Tate, E., Trust, T., & Frieder, O. (2025). Using ChatGPT as a lesson planning assistant with preservice secondary mathematics teachers. Diperoleh dari: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-025-00135-9
Wulan, R., Baihaqi, Ardhi D. & Saputra, Eddy. (2024). Inovasi pembelajaran dalam mengoptimalkan peran teknologi AI sebagai pendukung pembelajaran adaptif proses belajar mengajar di SMPN 271. Jurnal PKM: Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 7(6), 800-808.











