PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JIGSAW DAN TEACHING GAMES FOR UNDERSTANDING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN SERVIS BACKSPIN BACKHAND SISWA KELAS XI DALAM PERMAINAN TENIS MEJA

  • Cipto Nazzario Putra Universitas Mandiri
  • Wahyu Saputra Universitas Mandiri
  • Asep Akbaruddin Universitas Mandiri
  • Mochammad Fajar Permana Universitas Mandiri
  • Gugun Gunawan Universitas Mandiri
Keywords: Jigsaw, TGFU, Backspin Backhand Serve, Table Tennis, Motor Learning

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of Jigsaw and Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) learning models on the backspin backhand serve skills of table tennis in class XI students of SMKN 1 Subang. This study was an experimental method with a pre-test post-test design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMKN 1 Subang, the sample of this study were 40 people. The instrument used for data collection was the table tennis backspin backhand service skill test. The results showed that the Jigsaw learning model pre-test mean was 26.45 and the post-test mean was 15.45, with the lowest score being 21 and the highest being 32. While the TGFU type group obtained a pre-test mean score of 26.30 and a post-test mean of 15.75. With the lowest number 21 and the highest number 32. In the paired-test test in hypothesis one, the Jigsaw Type method shows a significant value of .000 and for hypothesis two the TGFU Type Method shows a significant value of .000. whereas the three hypothesis tests of the Jigsaw Type Method and the TGFU Type Method show the same results .567. then the difference is calculated, the Jigsaw Type Method is 0.55, while the TGFU Type Method is 0.53. so it can be concluded that the Jigsaw Type Method on the backspin backhand tennis table service at SMKN 1 Subang is better than the TGFU Type Method.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Buku :
Akinoglu, O., & Tandogan, R. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students' academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 301-309.
Depdiknas. (2003). Tenis meja dan teknik dasar yang wajib dikuasai. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta.
Hisyam Zaini. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran aktif. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Husdarta. (2011). Penelitian pendidikan jasmani. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Isjoni. (2009). Cooperative learning: Efektivitas pembelajaran kelompok. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Husdarta. (2018). Penelitian pendidikan jasmani. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Letts, G. (2006). Table Tennis: Steps to Success. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
Lie, A. (2008). Cooperative learning: Mempraktikkan cooperative learning di ruang-ruang kelas. Grasindo, Jakarta.
Muhajir. (2006). Pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Nana Sudjana. (2017). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Rosdiani, D. (2014). Pendidikan jasmani, olahraga, dan kesehatan. Grasindo, Jakarta.
Rusman. (2008). Model-model pembelajaran: Mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Rusman. (2012). Model-model pembelajaran: Mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Setiawan, & Nopembri. (2004). Penelitian pendidikan jasmani. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 model pembelajaran inovatif dalam kurikulum 2013. Ar-Ruzz Media, Yogyakarta.
Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: Teori, riset, dan praktik. Nusa Media, Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2007). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Suharsimi, A. (1989). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Sukardi. (2007). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan kompetensi dan praktiknya. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Suharsimi, A. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Syamsu, Y. (2004). Psikologi perkembangan anak dan remaja. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi konstruktivistik. Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.
Volkov, D. (2012). Table tennis tactics. New in Chess, Alkmaar, Belanda.

Jurnal :
Chuangui Mao & Tao Liu. (2023). A comparative biomechanical analysis of topspin forehand against topspin and backspin in table tennis.
Duo, W.-C., Wong, W. C. C., & Lee, W. L. (2020). Biomechanics of table tennis: A systematic scoping review of playing levels and maneuvers. Applied Sciences, 10 (15), 5203.
Fariq, A. (2011). Perkembangan dunia konseling memasuki era globalisasi. Pedagogi, II Nov 2011(Universitas Negeri Padang), 255-262.
He, J., & Li, J. (2018). Study on the application of microteaching method in the popularization of sports table tennis in colleges and universities in southwest China.
Hodgson, J., & Weil, J. (2011). Commentary: How individual and profession-level factors influence discussion of disability in prenatal genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1-3.
Jing, S., Haochen, L., & Huiqun, Z. (2020). Research on automatic generation of table tennis technique and tactics collection template. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 10(1), 201-206.
Lesnussa, J. A., Solissa, J., & Hukubun, M. D. (2022). Meningkatkan hasil belajar servis backhand dalam permainan tenis meja melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw pada siswa kelas VII sekolah menengah pertama negeri I Leksula. MANGGUREBE: Journal Physical Education, Health and Recreation, 3(1), 1-9.
Lyznicki, J. M., Young, D. C., Riggs, J. A., Davis, R. M., & Dickinson, B. D. (2001). Obesity: Assessment and management in primary care. American Family Physician, 63(11), 2185-2196.
Peter, A., & Hastie. (2023). Sport pedagogy research and its contribution to the rediscovery of joyful participation in physical education. Kinesiology Review, 12(1), 28-35.
Pushpendra, P. (2018). A comparative study of different training methods on the performance of table tennis players. 13(5), 22-24.
Riyan S. Tumaloto. (2014). Meningkatkan kemampuan pukulan backhand dalam permainan tenis meja melalui metode pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw pada siswa kelas XI di SMK Negeri 2 Gorontalo.
Shibin, L., Nor, A., & Buang. (2023). Research on improving the teaching effectiveness of table tennis in middle schools under the background of teaching psychology. 2(2), 83-89.
Situmorang, Y., Putra, R. P., Ilham, Z., Nababan, A. A., Nasution, U., & Ahady, M. Y. (2024). ANALISIS KETEPATAN SERVIS BACKHAND DRIVE PADA PEMAIN TENIS MEJA. Jurnal Multidisiplin Inovatif, 8(5).
Uzun, M. E., Akandere, M., & Tükel, Y. (2020). The investigation of elite table tennis sportsmen in terms of their risk evaluations. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 22(2), 255-264.
Published
2024-08-25
How to Cite
Cipto Nazzario Putra, Wahyu Saputra, Asep Akbaruddin, Mochammad Fajar Permana, & Gugun Gunawan. (2024). PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JIGSAW DAN TEACHING GAMES FOR UNDERSTANDING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN SERVIS BACKSPIN BACKHAND SISWA KELAS XI DALAM PERMAINAN TENIS MEJA. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 10(3), 330 - 340. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v10i3.3928