MODEL INTEGRATIF ANALISIS DATA EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF, ANALISIS TEMATIK, DAN OBSERVASI KELAS DI SMP PLUS AR RAHMAT
Keywords:
educational evaluation, integrative model, descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, classroom observation
Abstract
Effective educational evaluation requires an analytic model that connects measurable outcomes with the learning processes that produce them. This study refined an integrative model of educational evaluation data analysis by combining descriptive statistics, thematic qualitative analysis, and classroom observation. The study used a conceptual review supported by field data from an IPS lesson in class 8B of SMP Plus Ar Rahmat on 27 April 2026. Quantitative data were collected through an observation rubric, attendance records, participation counts, and academic ledger documentation, while qualitative data were obtained from classroom field notes. The synchronized observation score was 41 out of 88, or 46.59 percent, and was categorized as sufficient. Active participation was low, with only 3 of 17 students asking questions, or 17.65 percent. The academic ledger showed relatively strong IPS achievement, with scores ranging from 84 to 89 and a mean of 87.63. Thematic analysis identified five themes: limited participation, less conducive classroom conditions, complex material without adequate media, interrupted instructional focus, and strong student manners.
References
Abu Bakar, M., Ismail, S., & Darwi, L. M. (2024). ISO 21001:2018 in academia: A review of literature. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices, 7(26), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEMP.726006
Batten, J., & Brackett, A. (2021). Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 5, quality appraisal, data extraction, synthesis. Heart & Lung, 50(5), 615–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.04.002
Bramer, W. M., Milic, J., & Mast, F. (2017). Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(1), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.111
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Gunnulfsen, A. E. (2021). Applying the integration dimensions of quantitative and qualitative methods in education policy research: Lessons learned from investigating micro policymaking in Norwegian schools. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211028349
Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book review: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40–41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
Isnaeni, W., & Kumaidi. (2015). An evaluation of the PSA implementation in biology teaching at state high schools in Semarang city using the mixed-method approach. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4561
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Lorenzetti, D. L., & Ghali, W. A. (2013). Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An exploration of usage and usability. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-141
McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. A. (2019). Mixed methods in educational psychology inquiry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.008
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Sawaluddin, S. (2018). Konsep evaluasi dalam pembelajaran pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 3(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.25299/althariqah.2018.vol3(1).1775
Soler-Gallart, M., Avramov, D., Zoidou Saripapa, N., Melgarejo, K., González López, C., Troya Porras, M., Pistón-Pozo, A., Oliver, E., Ramis-Salas, M., Díez-Palomar, J., & Lopez de Aguileta, G. (2025). What are the statistics that improve education? Social Sciences, 14(7), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14070425
Villeneuve, A., & Bouchamma, Y. (2023). Data-driven decision making using local multi-source data: Analysis of a teacher-researcher’s professional practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 104198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104198
Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 21001:2018 educational organizations - Management systems for educational organizations - Requirements with guidance for use. https://www.iso.org/standard/66266.html
Batten, J., & Brackett, A. (2021). Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 5, quality appraisal, data extraction, synthesis. Heart & Lung, 50(5), 615–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.04.002
Bramer, W. M., Milic, J., & Mast, F. (2017). Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(1), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.111
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Gunnulfsen, A. E. (2021). Applying the integration dimensions of quantitative and qualitative methods in education policy research: Lessons learned from investigating micro policymaking in Norwegian schools. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211028349
Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book review: Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40–41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
Isnaeni, W., & Kumaidi. (2015). An evaluation of the PSA implementation in biology teaching at state high schools in Semarang city using the mixed-method approach. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4561
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Lorenzetti, D. L., & Ghali, W. A. (2013). Reference management software for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An exploration of usage and usability. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-141
McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. A. (2019). Mixed methods in educational psychology inquiry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.008
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Sawaluddin, S. (2018). Konsep evaluasi dalam pembelajaran pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 3(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.25299/althariqah.2018.vol3(1).1775
Soler-Gallart, M., Avramov, D., Zoidou Saripapa, N., Melgarejo, K., González López, C., Troya Porras, M., Pistón-Pozo, A., Oliver, E., Ramis-Salas, M., Díez-Palomar, J., & Lopez de Aguileta, G. (2025). What are the statistics that improve education? Social Sciences, 14(7), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14070425
Villeneuve, A., & Bouchamma, Y. (2023). Data-driven decision making using local multi-source data: Analysis of a teacher-researcher’s professional practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 104198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104198
Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 21001:2018 educational organizations - Management systems for educational organizations - Requirements with guidance for use. https://www.iso.org/standard/66266.html
Published
2026-07-11
How to Cite
Ita Juwita Muhamad, & Mulyawan Safwandy. (2026). MODEL INTEGRATIF ANALISIS DATA EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF, ANALISIS TEMATIK, DAN OBSERVASI KELAS DI SMP PLUS AR RAHMAT. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(3), 207 - 218. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i3.17404
Section
Articles
