REKONSTRUKSI AKSIOLOGI ILMU: INTEGRASI ETIKA DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB MORAL DALAM PRAKTIK KEILMUAN MODERN

  • Irpan Hilmi STAI Al Hidayah Tasikmalaya)
  • Naih Nurjanah IAI Persis Bandung
  • Supiana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Keywords: reconstruction of axiology, scientific ethics, moral responsibility, philosophy of science, modern scientific practice

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the concept of the axiology of science through the integration of ethical values and moral responsibility within modern scientific practice, as a response to the problem of scientific neutrality and the negative impacts of the development of science and technology. The research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, analyzing primary and secondary sources in the philosophy of science, ethics, and relevant contemporary thought. Data analysis is conducted using descriptive-analytical and critical methods to identify the limitations of classical axiological paradigms and to formulate a more integrative conceptual framework. The findings indicate that the paradigm of value-neutral science is no longer relevant in the modern context, thereby necessitating a reconstruction of axiology that positions ethics as an inherent foundation in both the production and application of scientific knowledge. The integration of ethics and the moral responsibility of scientists is essential to ensure that science is oriented toward human welfare and the sustainability of life. Thus, the reconstruction of the axiology of science contributes to the development of a more humane, responsible, and civilized scientific practice.

References

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2005). Ihya’ ‘ulum al-din. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Shatibi, A. I. (2003). Al-muwafaqat fi usul al-shari‘ah. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Bakhtiar, A. (2012). Filsafat ilmu. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Bertens, K. (2011). Etika. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Biddle, J. B. (2024). Organizations and values in science and technology. Philosophy of Science, 91(5), 1428–1437. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.33
de Melo-Martín, I. (2024). Concerns about contextual values in science and the legitimate/illegitimate distinction. Philosophy of Science, 91(5), 1379–1388. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.154
Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78
Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001
Faizah, U. (2020). Etika lingkungan dan aplikasinya dalam pendidikan menurut perspektif aksiologi. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 3(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v3i1.22446
Ferdman, A. (2024). What do we teach to engineering students: Embedded ethics, morality, and politics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00469-1
Frigo, G., Milchram, C., & Hillerbrand, R. (2023). Designing for care. Science and Engineering Ethics, 29, Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00434-4
Gunawan, I., Mustopa, M., Nawawi, F., & Rohmawati, H. S. (2022). Kontribusi filsafat moral dalam meningkatkan karakter kinerja pada masyarakat produktif. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v5i1.42290
Ibn Khaldun. (2004). Al-Muqaddimah. Dar al-Fikr.
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press.
Kennedy, M. R., Haustein, S., & Larivière, V. (2023). “It is very difficult for us to separate ourselves from this system”: The challenges of research integrity in the contemporary academic environment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21, 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09469-x
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Le Bihan, S. (2024). How to not secure public trust in science: Representative values versus polarization and marginalization. Philosophy of Science, 91(5), 1409–1418. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.150
Linville, C. L., Bridges, B. A., Solis, C., Jones, W. M., Tanona, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2023). How do scientists perceive the relationship between ethics and science? A pilot study of scientists’ conceptions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 29, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00429-1
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
Nurhayati, N., Latif, M., & Anwar, K. (2023). Source of knowledge through axiology perspective. Dharmawangsa: International Journal of the Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, 4(2), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.46576/english.v4i2.3618
Pinto, M. F. (2024). Pandemic science and commercial values: An institutional account of values in science. Philosophy of Science, 91(5), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.149
Putri, N. V., & Maharani, S. D. (2024). Max Scheler’s value philosophy: Nilai dalam pandangan Max Scheler. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.67498
Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of science: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074991
Rolin, K. (2015). Values in science: The case of scientific collaboration. Philosophy of Science, 82(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1086/680522
Rosnawati, R., Syukri, A., Badarussyamsi, B., & Rizki, A. F. (2021). Aksiologi ilmu pengetahuan dan manfaatnya bagi manusia. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i2.35975
Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975950
Steel, D. (2018). Wishful thinking and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1086/699714
Suriasumantri, J. S. (2013). Filsafat ilmu: Sebuah pengantar populer. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Ulya, N. A., Nurdin, A., & Syahrin, A. (2024). Implikasi aksiologi ilmu terhadap implementasi Qanun Aceh: Pemahaman nilai dan etika. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i1.64391
van der Burg, S., & Swierstra, T. (2013). Ethics on the laboratory floor: Towards a cooperative ethics for the development of new and emerging science and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9316-1
Weber, M. (1946). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129–156). Oxford University Press.
Wiharto, M. (2012). Aksiologi keilmuan. Forum Ilmiah, 9(2), 144–150.
Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541391
Published
2026-07-27
How to Cite
Hilmi, I., Naih Nurjanah, & Supiana. (2026). REKONSTRUKSI AKSIOLOGI ILMU: INTEGRASI ETIKA DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB MORAL DALAM PRAKTIK KEILMUAN MODERN. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(3), 320 - 341. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i3.17342