METODOLOGI ILMU DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM SEBAGAI LANDASAN INTEGRASI ILMU DAN PENGEMBANGAN TRADISI AKADEMIK
Abstract
Education is essential for tackling worldwide issues like environmental challenges, social
disparities, and food availability. Nevertheless, the advancement of sustainable education in high
schools often faces obstacles due to scientific divides and disjointed curricula, which result in
students having only a limited grasp of sustainability topics. This article intends to explore how
combining different fields of study can be a key method for creating sustainable solutions within
schools. The research employs a library-based methodology using a descriptive-analytical
qualitative style, focusing on examining scholarly literature and analyzing secondary data. Findings
show that an interdisciplinary approach in educational settings can be effectively implemented
through a strategically designed thematic- integrative learning model. Comprehensive solutions in
classrooms are realized by integrating three main scientific viewpoints: bayani as the ethical-moral
base, burhani representing empirical-scientific evaluation, and irfani embodying the essence of
social compassion. Additionally, the article highlights the necessity for this integration model to
progress toward the Transintegration of Science guided by Systemic Thinking, in order to navigate
the complexities of modern society. By employing systemic processes, global issues are treated as a
unified collection of interconnected and mutually reliant components. The study concludes that
achieving sustainable solutions over the long term necessitates a shift from interdisciplinary methods
to strong transdisciplinary collaborations among schools, families, and local communities,
encouraging genuine actions that extend beyond the classroom.
Keywords: Disciplinary Integration, Thematic Learning, Transintegration of Science, Systemic
Thinking, Sustainable Solutions.
References
Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic studies di
perguruan tinggi: Pendekatan integratif-
interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Alvargonzález, D. (2011). Multidisciplinarity,
interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and
the
sciences. International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science, 25(4), 387–
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2011.62
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001).
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and
assessing: A
revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational
objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
Arifullah, M. (2015). Respon paradigmatik
transmodernis-me. Tajdid: Jurnal Ilmu
Ushuluddin, 14(2),
–270.
https://doi.org/10.24014/tajdid.v14i2.1585
Arifullah, M., & Fadhilah. (2020). Paradigma
ilmu transintegrasi: Revitalisasi arsitektur
ilmu holistik
Islam. Dalam Building Educational Paradigm
That Support the World Peace Through
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar,
ISSN Cetak : 2477-2143 ISSN Online : 2548-6950
Volume XX Nomor XX, Bulan Tahun
International Cooperation. Kolaborasi
Pascasarjana UIN STS Jambi - Fakulti
Pendidikan
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Assingkily, M. S., & Barus, U. S. B. (2019).
Pembelajaran tematik bagi anak usia dasar
(metodologi
dalam Islam). Nizhamiyah, 9(2), 43–61.
Ateljevic, I. (2013a). Transmodernity:
Integrating perspectives on societal
evolution. Futures, 47, 38–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.01.0
Ateljevic, I. (2013b). Visions of
transmodernity: A new renaissance of our
human history? Integral
Review: A Transdisciplinary & Transcultural
Journal for New Thought, Research, &
Praxis, 9(2), 205–218.
Atwater, J. B., Kannan, V. R., & Stephens, A.
A. (2008). Cultivating systemic thinking in
the next
generation of business leaders. Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 7(1),
–
https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2008.3141
Badi, J. A. (2017). Efficient leadership: A
systemic model of prophetic thinking
(Kepimpinan yang
berkesan: Model sistemik dari pemikir).
Journal of Islam in Asia, 14(3), 249–270.
Balagué, N., Torrents, C., Hristovski, R., &
Kelso, J. A. S. (2017). Sport science
integration: An
evolutionary synthesis. European Journal of
Sport Science, 17(1), 51–
https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.11
