KONSEP IDEAL PERADILAN KHUSUS DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM (PEMILU)
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the necessity of establishing a specialized electoral court with the authority to adjudicate various categories of electoral disputes as stipulated in the election law, namely administrative election violations, electoral process disputes, election result disputes, and electoral criminal offenses. Currently, each category of electoral dispute is handled by different institutions, creating the potential for overlapping jurisdictions that may affect the quality and consistency of judicial decisions. Therefore, the establishment of a specialized electoral court is essential to safeguard the integrity of elections while ensuring legal certainty and justice in the resolution of electoral disputes. This study employs a normative legal research method, which involves examining legal materials collected from various sources, including academic journals, books, legislation, and official websites, to address the research questions formulated in this study. The findings indicate the urgent need for a specialized electoral court, supported by a comprehensive legal framework governing the appointment of judges, institutional design, and procedural law. Such a framework is expected to enable electoral cases to be resolved in a simple, expeditious, and effective manner, thereby strengthening electoral integrity.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Hukum tata negara & pilar-pilar demokrasi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika.
Hamzah, A. (1994). Pelaksanaan peradilan pidana berdasar teori dan praktek. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Rineka Cipta.
Surbakti, R. (2015). Transformasi Bawaslu dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengawasan pemilu. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan Indonesia.
Jurnal :
Maulidin, L. (2011). Analisis putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menyelesaikan perselisihan hasil pemilukada ditinjau dari perspektif teori hukum progresif (Kajian terhadap putusan MK atas sengketa hasil pemilu kepala daerah Jawa Timur dan putusan MK dalam perkara perselisihan hasil pemilu). Jurnal Konstitusi, 4(1), 74–75.
Salim, C. S., & Aridhayandi, M. R. (2022). Urgensi peradilan khusus pemilihan umum (Pemilu) di Indonesia dalam sistem hukum positif. Proceeding Justicia Conference, 1, 115.
Solihah, R., Bainus, A., & Rosyidin, I. (2018). Pentingnya pengawasan partisipatif dalam mengawal pemilihan umum yang berintegritas dan demokratis. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 3(1), 14–15.
Wangoi, W. A. (2016). Asas peradilan sederhana cepat dan biaya ringan dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana menurut KUHAP. Lex Privatum, 4(7), 39.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 15
Dokumen Pemerintah
Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum. (2019). Update data pelanggaran Pemilu tahun 2019 per 4 November 2019. Diambil dari https://www.bawaslu.go.id/id/hasil-pengawasan-pemilu/update-data-pelanggaran-pemilu-tahun-2019-4-november-2019
