PERAN IDEOLOGI PANCASILA DALAM MENANGKAL HOAKS DAN POLARISASI DI MEDIA SOSIAL
Abstract
The development of social media in the digital era has made it easier for people to access and disseminate information, but it has also created various challenges, such as the spread of hoaxes and social polarization. Hoaxes and polarization in digital spaces have the potential to threaten national unity, reduce the quality of public discourse, and weaken social cohesion. This article aims to analyze the role of Pancasila ideology in countering hoaxes and polarization on social media. The research employs a literature review method by collecting relevant references from scientific journals, articles, and previous studies. The data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach to examine the relationship between Pancasila values and efforts to create a healthy digital environment. The findings indicate that the values of Pancasila, including honesty, humanity, unity, deliberation, and social justice, can serve as moral foundations for addressing digital challenges. Furthermore, strengthening character education and Pancasila-based digital literacy plays an important role in enhancing people's ability to think critically, verify information, and respect diverse opinions. Therefore, the implementation of Pancasila values can be an effective strategy to combat hoaxes, reduce social polarization, and strengthen national unity in the digital era.
References
Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha, Ashfiya Nur Atqiya, Ihsan Khoirul Anam, Hesti Arlinda Natasya, & Rizquna Salsabila. (2025). Implementasi Nilai - Nilai Pancasila dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(1), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v4i1.5063
Amelia, M., & Prasiwi, B. (2026). Peran literasi digital dalam mencegah disinformasi dan hoaks di media sosial : upaya membangun masyarakat yang kritis dan cerdas. 4, 1191–1197.
Ema Welan etal, A., Ema Welan, A., Kampas, E., Pamulang, U., Raya Puspitek, J., Pamulang, K., Tangerang Selatan, K., Banten, P., & Pos, K. (2025). Tantangan Ideologi Pancasila Di Era Media Sosial: Analisis Pengaruh Polarisasi Digital terhadap Persatuan Bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dan Politik (JPKP), 3(2), 146–157.
Hidayah, Y., Simatupang, E., Belladonna, A. P., Colombo, J., No, Y., Malang, K., & Istimewa, D. (2022). Pembudayaan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Konsep Etika. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 2(2), 208–215.
Info, A. (2024). Implementasi Pancasila di era digitalisasi Safari Nurliana 1 , Achmad Akmaludin 2. 1–5.
Lutfi, M. F. R., Maramis, C., Rahmadani, Z. D., Aditina, N. F., Rahmadini, M., Hanif, I. L., & Mansur, A. P. (2025). Revitalisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila sebagai Upaya Menangkal Polarisasi Politik di Era Media Sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 9(3), 36414–36420.
MAGARETA, C. A. S., PUSPITA, C. C., PERMONO, Y. A., & FITRIONO, R. A. (2022). Penerapan Pancasila Dalam Bermedia Sosial. Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, 4(4), 13–18.
Mujahidah, I., & Dewi, D. A. (2022). Internalisasi Nilai Pancasila Terhadap Generasi Muda Sebagai Wujud Mempertahankan Budaya Bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Dan Humaniora, 13(2), 431. https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v13i2.54773
Nasution, D. A., Rizky, M. C., Anggraeini, F. A., Surbakti, F. Y., Harefa, D. A., & Ramadan, F. (n.d.). Critical Thinking di Era Distorsi Informasi : Membedah.
Nurul Hidayat. (2025). Narasi Kebangsaan di Era Media Sosial: Relevansi Pancasila dalam Ekosistem Digital. PACIVIC: Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.36456/p.v5i1.10183
Paus Yohanes Paulus II. (19933). Veritatis Splendor (Cahaya Kebenaran). 156.
Rahmawati, D. (2018). Risiko Polarisasi Algoritma Media Sosial : Kajian Terhadap Kerentanan Sosial dan Ketahanan Bangsa. Jurnal Kajian Lemhanas RI, 33(Maret), 37–49.
Victorio, W., Tumanggor, R. O., Maharani, B., Pasya, N. I., Angel, G., & Pangestu, Y. (2025). Penerapan Nilai Kerakyatan Pancasila dalam Menangkal Polarisasi Opini di Media Sosial. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3432
