PENGARUH MANAJEMEN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS AI DAN PARTISIPASI BELAJAR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN CODING SISWA MELALUI MOTIVASI BELAJAR DI SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 3 PUCANG GADING
Abstract
The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology opens new opportunities for managing learning in vocational high schools, particularly in supporting the improvement of students' coding ability. This study aims to explore in depth the implementation of AI-based learning management, student participation, and learning motivation and their influence on students' coding ability at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Pucang Gading. This research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Research subjects consisted of informatics teachers, students, and the school principal selected through purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation study. Data validity was examined through source triangulation and technique triangulation. Data analysis used the interactive analysis model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). The results indicate that: (1) AI-based learning management at SMK Muhammadiyah 3 Pucang Gading has made a positive contribution to the development of students' coding ability through adaptive learning and automated feedback features; (2) students' active participation cognitively, emotionally, and behaviorally is the main supporting factor for successful coding learning; (3) students' learning motivation developed positively along with the implementation of AI-based learning and served as a bridge between the quality of learning management and students' coding achievement. These findings provide important implications for the development of technology-based learning policies in vocational high school settings.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Hair, J. F., Henseler, J., Castillo, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mou, T. Y. (2020). An examination of coding ability and computational thinking of pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n3p26
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Papadakis, S. (2022). Apps to promote computational thinking and coding skills in children of preschool and pre-primary school age: A pedagogical challenge for the 21st century. Education Sciences, 12(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050318
Pelletier, K., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Roberts, J., & Musser, M. (2022). 2022 EDUCAUSE horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1610658
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Tsai, C. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, M. J. (2020). Students' scientific epistemic beliefs, online search strategies, and online search outcomes: A study of college students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 49–61.
Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-solving STEM education: A case study of a Hong Kong primary school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101194
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
