MODEL INTEGRATIF PENGUMPULAN DATA DALAM EVALUASI DAN SUPERVISI PENDIDIKAN
Abstract
Accurate, comprehensive, and relevant data collection is needed in educational evaluation and supervision so that improvement decisions do not rely on a single source of information. This study aims to describe the application of an integrative model of data collection methods and techniques in educational evaluation and supervision through observation, interviews, questionnaires, document analysis, and digital data. This study used a qualitative method with a descriptive approach at SMA Tunas Unggul. Data were collected through classroom observation, field notes, interviews, questionnaires, document review, and school digital data tracking. The data were analyzed qualitatively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the integrative model can describe learning conditions more comprehensively because it combines various sources and data collection techniques. Observation showed that learning supervision had been implemented in a fairly structured way through schedules, instruments, and classroom observation. However, LMS use was not yet consistent across all subjects, the use of digital data for evaluation still varied, and follow-up actions from supervision results were not fully documented. Documents, interviews, questionnaires, and digital data served as comparison sources to strengthen the validity of the findings. The integrative model can serve as a systematic, adaptive, and contextual operational framework for supervisors and educational evaluators in developing improvement recommendations that are more objective, concrete, and evidence-based.
Keywords: educational evaluation, educational supervision, observation, integrative model, qualitative method.
References
Afriani, L., Bafadal, I., Ubaidillah, A. F., & Utari, T. I. (2025). Principal Supervision at The Educational Unit Level : Implementation of Organizational Management and Control. 6(2).
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory.
Barokah, A. I., & Raharja, S. (2025). Developing a community-based academic supervision model : A strategic reform for enhancing professional learning in Indonesian primary schools. 9(4).
Bowen, G. A. (1997). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.
Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research : Interviews , Focus Groups , Observations , and Document Analysis Triangulation in qualitative research Interviews in qualitative research. 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2020). Designing and conducting mixed methods of research. Beyond Bullying, 74–82.
Creswell J. W., & D., C. J. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publications,Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education.
Crofford, H. (2026). Counseling Professionals ’ Perspectives on AI Integration in Education and Supervision : A Concept Mapping Study. 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.70016
Dr. Rusydi Ananda, M. Pd. Dr. T. R. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan.
Ediyanto, E., Zulkipli, Z., Sunandar, A., & Yunus, M. (2025). Triangulation in Educational Research : A Literature Review (Number Icemt 2024). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-370-2
Fikri, miftahul, D. (2019). Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Supervisi Pendidikan. nulisbuku.com.
Fink. (2003). No How to Ask Survey Questions. SAGE Publications.
Hopkins. (1987). Improving the quality of schooling lessons from the OECD International School Improvement Project.
Ilmiah, J., Fkip, P., Mandiri, U., Cetak, I., & Online, I. (2025). 4 1234. 11.
Mcmillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (n.d.). James h. mcmillan * sally schumacher.
Michael Quinn Patton. (2012). Qualitative Research, Evaluation Methode.
Moss, L., Merlin-knoblich, C., & Cholewa, B. (2026). RESEARCH ARTICLE A Consensual Qualitative Research Study of School Counseling Site Supervisors ’ Group Work Supervision. 1, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.70012
Mulder, S., Lehmann, E., & Grichko, V. (2025a). Empowering Teacher Supervisors: A Case Study on the Impact of an Instructional Walkthrough Tool. Journal of Educational Supervision, 8(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.69772/jes.8.3.3
Mulder, S., Lehmann, E., & Grichko, V. (2025b). Empowering Teacher Supervisors: A Case Study on the Impact of an Instructional Walkthrough Tool. Journal of Educational Supervision, 8(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.69772/jes.8.3.3
Nur’rohim, E. W. (2025). Systematic Literature Review : Strategi Supervisi yang Inovatif untuk Meningkatkan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan di Sekolah. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 6(1), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v6i1.1153
Patterson, J. L., & Kelleher, P. (2005). Resilient School Leaders: Strategies for Turning Adversity into Achievement. In Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
