APRESIASI SASTRA DAN KRITIK DRAMA TRADISIONAL DAN MODERN: KAJIAN LINTAS ANGKATAN 1920, 1933, 1945, HINGGA 2000-AN
Abstract
This study examines the development of literary appreciation and dramatic criticism in Indonesian literature from the 1920s generation through the 2000s, employing a historical-critical approach and reception theory. The study focuses on how each literary generation responded to its respective social, political, and cultural conditions through dramatic works, and how literary criticism reflected those responses as expressions of aesthetic and ideological values. A literature review method was employed, drawing on primary sources including dramatic texts and critical documents, as well as secondary sources comprising journal articles and academic books published within the last decade. Findings indicate that each generation constructed distinct aesthetic conventions: the 1920s generation relied on Malay-Western literary traditions; the 1933 generation introduced social realism as a response to colonialism; the 1945 generation emphasized post-war universal humanism; while contemporary drama of the 2000s is characterized by formal experimentation, cultural hybridity, and narrative fragmentation. These findings demonstrate that Indonesian dramatic criticism cannot be separated from its sociohistorical context and the evolving dynamics of public reception. Theoretical implications reinforce the argument that literary appreciation is inherently contextual and relational, while practical implications are relevant to curriculum development and dramatic work evaluation in Indonesia.
References
Abrams, M. H. (1953). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. Oxford University Press.
Damono, S. D. (2018). Sastra Indonesia modern: Perspektif postkolonial dan kontemporer. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Eagleton, T. (2016). Literary theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Faruk. (2014). Pengantar sosiologi sastra: Dari strukturalisme genetik hingga postmodernisme (edisi revisi). Pustaka Pelajar.
Fadhilla, I., & Saparudin, E. (2022). Transformasi kritik sastra Indonesia dalam perspektif multidisipliner. Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.30762/narasi.v1i1.875
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception (T. Bahti, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Lestari, A., Nugraha, R., & Hidayat, M. (2024). Perubahan struktur sosial dan transformasi estetika sastra Indonesia modern. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.31000/lgrm.v13i3.11707
Nurhadi, & Suharto, B. (2019). Drama Indonesia dalam perspektif historis-kritis: Kajian produksi, resepsi, dan sistem nilai. Jurnal Lingua, 15(2), 87–104.https://doi.org/10.15294/lingua.v15i2.21345
Pradopo, R. D. (2020). Pengkajian puisi dan apresiasi sastra: Pendekatan struktural dan intertekstual. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Purwaningsih, L., Setiawan, A., & Kurniawati, D. (2023). Apresiasi sastra dan penguatan literasi budaya dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 11(2), 55–68.
Ratna, N. K. (2015). Teori, metode, dan teknik penelitian sastra. Pustaka Pelajar.
Rosidi, A. (2013). Ikhtisar sejarah sastra Indonesia. Binacipta.
Sumardjo, J. (2019). Perkembangan teater dan drama Indonesia. STSI Press.
Teeuw, A. (2015). Sastra dan ilmu sastra: Pengantar teori sastra. Kiblat Buku Utama.
Utami, N. P., Suryadi, D., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Drama Indonesia modern sebagai kritik sosial dalam perspektif estetika. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 12(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.20961/basastra.v11i2.76757
Wiyatmi. (2018). Ideologi, gender, dan identitas dalam sastra Indonesia modern. Ombak.
Yudiaryani. (2020). Dramaturgi kontemporer Indonesia: Estetika, eksperimen, dan hibriditas budaya. ISI Yogyakarta Press











