Evaluasi Program Pengembangan SDM

  • Anisa fitriani UIN SMH Banten
  • Azwa Nailafath UIN SMH Banten
  • machdum Bachtiar UIN SMH Banten
Keywords: Keywords: Program Evaluation, Human Resource Development, Training Effectiveness.

Abstract

Human Resource Development (HRD) program evaluation is an essential process in determining the effectiveness and efficiency of training and development activities within an organization. This study discusses the importance of evaluating HRD programs to measure their contribution to improving employee competence, performance, and professionalism. The evaluation process involves several aspects, including participant reactions, learning outcomes, behavioral changes, stakeholder satisfaction, and organizational impact. Various evaluation models such as CIPP, Kirkpatrick, Abruzzese, and Alspach are highlighted as frameworks for assessing training effectiveness comprehensively. In the digital era, HRD programs also play a strategic role in helping employees and educators adapt to technological advancements, including the integration of digital learning systems and artificial intelligence in the workplace. The study emphasizes that effective training programs must be based on organizational needs, supported by appropriate methods and materials, and followed by continuous evaluation. Furthermore, efficient management of costs and resources is necessary to maximize program outcomes without unnecessary expenditure. The findings indicate that systematic evaluation enables organizations to identify strengths and weaknesses in HRD programs and supports strategic decision-making for sustainable human resource improvement and long-term organizational competitiveness.

 

References

Gustiana, R., Hidayat, T., & Fauzi, A. (2022). Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia (Suatu Kajian Literatur Review Ilmu Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi,
file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/JBFE+PAGE+60-73%20(1).pd file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/04.+Muhammad+Asir+et+al+4(1),+32-%20(2).pdf file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/marudur,+B
6.+EDIT+-+6.+4+Nop+2020.pdf file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/Faqihatul+Ulyah%20(1)%20(1).pdf
file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/203-Article%20Text-103-1-10-20180323%20(1).pdf
file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/13167-Article%20Text-15047-1-10-20231110%20(2).pdf
file:///C:/Users/usER/Downloads/982-2825-1-PB.pdf
Prayogi, S., Muliadi, A., & Nufida, B. A. (2021). Kepuasan pemangku kepentingan pada layanan manajemen kelembagaan di fakultas penyelenggara pendidikan swasta. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 9(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v9i2.4837
Wahyuni, S., Zamroni, R., Apriani, R., Fajarianto, O., Yuniawatika, S., Syarifa, N.
K., & Kusumaningtyas, F. I. (2024). Development of a stakeholder satisfaction system model for service and education quality. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(3), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.54383
Singh, A., & Singla, L. (2021). Stakeholders satisfaction regarding service quality in higher management education. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS).
Betingo, V. L., & Martir, E. M. (2025). Resource allocation, operational efficiency, and stakeholders’ satisfaction. International Journal of Science and Management Studies, 8(5), 254–275. DOI:10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v8i5p115
Ali, M., Ur Rehman, S., & Qadeer, A. (2025). Fulfilling stakeholder needs and concerns: A path to satisfaction in construction projects. Construction Technologies and Architecture, 17(73–80). https://doi.org/10.4028/p-5RMm6F
Serdamayanti. (2014). Analisis efisiensi biaya operasional. (tesis/paper).
Coelli, T. J., et al. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. (teori efisiensi).
Published
2026-06-06
How to Cite
Anisa fitriani, Azwa Nailafath, & machdum Bachtiar. (2026). Evaluasi Program Pengembangan SDM. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(02), 265 - 278. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i02.15067

Most read articles by the same author(s)