ASESMEN OTENTIK DAN EVALUASI BERBASIS KINERJA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN ABAD KE-21
Abstract
Authentic assessment and performance-based evaluation are increasingly relevant assessment approaches in 21st-century learning, emphasizing the development of critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and contextual problem-solving skills. However, the implementation of these two approaches in the field still faces various obstacles, including low teacher assessment literacy and limited adequate assessment instruments. This study aims to analyze the concepts, characteristics, implementation strategies, and challenges of authentic assessment and performance-based evaluation through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. Data were collected from national journals accredited by SINTA 4 and SINTA 5 and relevant literature published between 2021 and 2026. The analysis was conducted with reference to the PRISMA guidelines through the stages of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion, resulting in a final total of 13 articles. The results indicate that authentic assessment is able to assess students' learning outcomes holistically across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects, while performance-based evaluation emphasizes students' ability to demonstrate competency through real-world tasks. Both approaches have been proven to contribute to increasing learning engagement and mastery of 21st-century competencies. However, optimal implementation requires teacher preparedness, systematic planning, and adequate institutional support.
References
Book:
Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In the technical report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. Durhan.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
Journal:
Adriantoni, Afia, B., Yessari, M., & Yeni, Z. (2025). Asesmen Otentik Sebagai Sarana Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. 11, 1–8.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Fardana, Y., & Pantiwati, Y. (2025). Development of Authentic Assessment Instruments in PJBL in Fine Arts Learning for Grade 4 at Muhammadiyah 4 Elementary School Malang City. 11(1), 41–52.
Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In the technical report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE. Durhan. Retrieved from https://legacyfileshare.elsevier.com/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
Munjiah, A. U., & Utari, E. (2026). Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Unjuk Kerja untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains pada Peserta Didik Kelas 4 di Sekolah Dasar Negeri 2 Binong A. Pendahuluan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) merupakan salah satu mata pelajaran yang memiliki peran strategi. 10(1), 263–280.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences. Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
Puteri, A. N., Yoenanto, N. H., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2023). Efektivitas Asesmen Autentik dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i1.3535
Sagara, K. R., Hasan, A. V. A., Anggriawan, D., Nurjaman, G. J. K., Taufan, M., Daya, T., & Suryana, A. (2026). Studi literatur: Asesmen Otentik Dan Berbasis Kompetensi Dalam Pembelajaran MIPA. (10), 763–773.
Satria, M. R. (2024). Transformasi Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Dan Revitalisasi Asesmen Pembelajaran Di Indonesia. 17, 57–66.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Yuxiao, Y. X., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Sage. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971











