PENGARUH KESADARAN ETIKA DIGITAL TERHADAP CIVIC BEHAVIOR MAHASISWA PPKN UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG

  • Annisa Salsabila Azzahra Universitas Lampung
  • Berchah Pitoewas Universitas Lampung
  • Nurhayati Nurhayati Universitas Lampung
  • Devi Sutrisno Putri Universitas Lampung
  • Rohman Universitas Lampung
Keywords: civic behavior, digital ethics awareness, students, PPKn University of Lampung

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the influence of digital ethics awareness on the civic behavior of students of the Pancasila and Citizenship Education (PPKn) Study Program at the University of Lampung. The research method used in this study is a descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The subjects of this study were PPKn students at the University of Lampung from 2022 to 2024 with a sample of 76 respondents. The data collection technique used a questionnaire and was strengthened by interview techniques. Based on the results of the study, it shows that digital ethics awareness influences the civic behavior of PPKn students at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Lampung. Based on a simple linear regression test, the RSquare value obtained was 0.109. This indicates that digital ethics awareness contributes 10.9% to the formation of student civic behavior, while the remaining 89.1% is influenced by other factors outside this research variable. The meaning of this 10.9% figure indicates that knowledge and internalization of digital ethical values ​​​​of PPKn students at the University of Lampung have become the basic foundation for behaving in the digital space. However, this low percentage also reveals the reality that digital citizenship behavior (civic behavior) is a very complex phenomenon and does not only depend on the normative understanding of individuals alone.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Baron, R. A. (2010). Psychology (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Dalton, R. J. (2017). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. CQ Press.

Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy. Yale University Press.

Digitalkreasi, & Deloitte. (2020). Digital literacy framework Indonesia.

Ekström, M. (2019). The participatory turn in news journalism: Guarding democracy or populism? Journal of Language and Politics, 18(2), 169–188.

Friggeri, A., Adamic, L. A., Eckles, D., & Cheng, J. (2014). Rumor cascades. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 101–110). https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8122

Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314567449

Print, M., & Lange, D. (2013). Civic education and civic behavior. Educational Research, 55(3), 299–315.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. Simon & Schuster.

Ribble, M. (2012). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). ISTE.

Sari, M., & Sugandi, A. (2022). Perilaku etis mahasiswa. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 10(2), 201–213.

Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.

Published
2026-03-09
How to Cite
Annisa Salsabila Azzahra, Berchah Pitoewas, Nurhayati Nurhayati, Devi Sutrisno Putri, & Rohman. (2026). PENGARUH KESADARAN ETIKA DIGITAL TERHADAP CIVIC BEHAVIOR MAHASISWA PPKN UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(01), 20 - 29. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i01.11987

Most read articles by the same author(s)