UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR MATERI KUBUS DAN BALOK MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION

Helma  Ramadhani; Nor Hafidah; Jumiati; Saskia Agustina; Marlina

doi:10.36989/didaktik.v12i01.11708

Helma Ramadhani Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Selatan
Nor Hafidah Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Selatan
Jumiati Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Selatan
Saskia Agustina Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Selatan
Marlina Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Selatan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i01.11708

Keywords: learning outcomes, cube and cuboid, Team Assisted Individualization, elementary school.

Abstract

This study aims to improve students’ mathematics learning outcomes on cube and cuboid topics through Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning in the fifth grade of elementary school. The problems underlying this study were the low students’ learning outcomes and the lack of student activeness in the mathematics learning process. This research employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) conducted in two cycles, each consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. The research subjects were 24 fifth-grade students of SDN Gambut 3. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and learning achievement tests. The results showed that teacher activity increased from 75% in Cycle I to 90% in Cycle II, while student activity improved from 68% to 88%. Students’ learning outcomes also improved, as indicated by the increase in classical learning mastery from 62% in the pre-cycle to 75% in Cycle I and reaching 92% in Cycle II. Based on these results, it can be concluded that Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning is effective in improving mathematics learning outcomes on cube and cuboid topics for fifth-grade elementary school students.

References

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bandura, A. (2021). Social Learning Theory. New York: Routledge.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Huda, M. (2013). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kemendikbud. (2018). Permendikbud Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 tentang KI dan KD. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kunandar. (2018). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Lie, A. (2017). Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Mulyasa, E. (2017). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Piaget, J. (2015). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge.

Rusman. (2017). Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sanjaya, W. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanto, A. (2016). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Trianto. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Van de Walle, J. A. (2018). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. Boston: Pearson Education.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Woolfolk, A. (2020). Educational Psychology. Boston: Pearson Education.

Yamin, M. (2017). Strategi dan Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Referensi.