KHILAFIYAH DAN PERBEDAAN MAZHAB

  • St. Nurfadillah. A Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • A. Dwi Mulyana Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Zubair Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Andi Farras Abbiyu Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • M. Amin Umar Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
Keywords: Khilafiyah, Madhhab Differences, Islamic Jurisprudence, Ijtihad, Muhammadiyah

Abstract

Differences of opinion (khilafiyah) and the diversity of legal schools (madhhab) are inseparable realities within the Islamic intellectual tradition. These differences emerge from the dynamic process of ijtihad undertaken by Muslim scholars in interpreting and understanding the Qur’an and the Sunnah, particularly in matters of furū‘iyyah that lack definitive (qaṭ‘ī) textual evidence. This article aims to examine the concept of khilafiyah and the diversity of Islamic legal schools, as well as to analyze Muhammadiyah’s perspective in responding to these phenomena. This study employs a qualitative method with a library research approach by examining classical fiqh literature, scholarly works, and official Muhammadiyah documents. The findings indicate that khilafiyah and differences among legal schools represent a form of Islamic intellectual richness, reflecting the flexibility and comprehensiveness of Islamic law. Muhammadiyah views these differences as an inevitable reality that should be managed in a scholarly, moderate, and tolerant manner through a return to the Qur’an and the Sunnah, the application of manhaj tarjīḥ, collective ijtihad (ijtihād jamā‘ī), and the rejection of excessive madhhab fanaticism. Through this approach, khilafiyah is not a source of conflict but a means of strengthening Islamic brotherhood and advancing progressive Islamic thought. This study is expected to contribute theoretically to a more proportional understanding of madhhab differences and to promote inclusive and constructive religious attitudes amid the plurality of the Muslim community.

Keywords: Khilafiyah, Madhhab Differences, Islamic Jurisprudence, Ijtihad, Muhammadiyah

References

Al-Jauziyyah, I. Q. (2000). I‘lām al-muwaqqi‘īn ‘an rabb al-‘ālamīn (Jilid 1). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Jaziri, A. (2003). Al-fiqh ‘alā al-madhāhib al-arba‘ah (Jilid 1). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Khallaf, A. W. (1978). ‘Ilm uṣūl al-fiqh. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam.

Al-Nawawi, Y. S. (2002). Al-majmū‘ sharḥ al-muhadhdhab (Jilid 3). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1994). Al-ṣaḥwah al-islāmiyyah bayna al-juhūd wa al-taṭarruf. Cairo: Dār al-Shurūq.

As-Suyuthi, J. (1993). Al-jāmi‘ al-ṣaghīr fī aḥādīth al-bashīr al-nadhīr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Asy-Syahrastani, M. (1993). Al-milal wa al-niḥal (Jilid 1). Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah.

Haedar, N. (2015). Islam berkemajuan: Perspektif Muhammadiyah tentang Islam. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah.

Ibn al-Jazari, M. (1998). Al-nashr fī al-qirā’āt al-‘ashr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Rusyd, A. W. (1994). Bidāyat al-mujtahid wa nihāyat al-muqtaṣid (Jilid 1). Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. (2018). Himpunan putusan tarjih Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah.

Nasution, H. (1985). Teologi Islam: Aliran-aliran sejarah analisa perbandingan. Jakarta: UI Press.

Shihab, M. Q. (2001). Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi dan peran wahyu dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Bandung: Mizan.

Sulidar. (2021). Manhaj tarjih Muhammadiyah dalam merespons perbedaan mazhab. Jurnal Al-Manahij, 15(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.XXXX

Syalabi, A. (1990). Tārīkh al-tashrī‘ al-islāmī. Cairo: Maktabah al-Nahḍah al-Miṣriyyah.

Zuhaili, W. (1989). Al-fiqh al-islāmī wa adillatuh (Jilid 1). Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.

Published
2026-01-13
How to Cite
Nurfadillah. A, S., Mulyana, A. D., Zubair, Abbiyu, A. F., & Umar, M. A. (2026). KHILAFIYAH DAN PERBEDAAN MAZHAB. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(01), 141 - 148. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v12i01.10975

Most read articles by the same author(s)