STUDI KOMPARASI KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN DAN SIKAP PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK

  • Sri Ratna Pratiwi Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Sumarno Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Aryo Andri Nugroho Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Keywords: Think Pair Share, Problem Based Learning, Problem Solving Ability

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning model with the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model in terms of problem solving abilities and attitudes in thematic learning class IV Theme 8 Sub theme 3 Learning 3. This research is a comparative research that compares the results research on the ability and attitude of problem solving in the experimental class 1 (SD Negeri Kalibalik 01) with the TPS model and the experimental class 2 (SD Negeri Sembung 02) with the PBL model. The data collection instruments used were problem-solving ability assessment sheets, problem-solving attitude observation sheets, self-assessment sheets for problem-solving attitudes, peer-to-peer assessment sheets for problem-solving attitudes. This instrument was developed based on the supervisor's review, the assessment of expert lecturers and practitioners. Based on the assessment of problem solving abilities, an average value of 69 was obtained in the experimental class 1 with the TPS model and an average value of 81 in the experimental class 2 with the PBL model. The results of the assessment of problem solving attitudes in the TPS class which consisted of 18 students had an average score of 81.18 from observations, 58.72 and 57.83 for assessments between friends and self-assessment of problem solving attitudes. While the results of the attitude assessment in the PBL class which consisted of 16 students had an average score of 85.62 from observations, 61.18 and 60.06 from assessments between friends and self-assessment of problem solving attitudes. For the effectiveness test used is the normality test, homogeneity test and the Independent Sample t-Test. The results of the normality test have a significance value of more than 0.05, so H0 is accepted, which means that the data is normally distributed. The results of the homogeneity test obtained a significance value of more than 0.05 so that H0 was accepted which means that the two classes were homogeneous or there was no difference in variance. The test results of the Independent Sample t-Test show that the significance of 2-tailed is less than 0.05, so there are differences in problem solving abilities and attitudes of students in thematic learning using the TPS and PBL learning models

References

Anggit. 2017. PBL dengan APM untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Sikap Percaya diri. Jurnal of primary Education. JPE6 (1) (2017).

Arikunto, S. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evluasi Pendidukan. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara
Arifin, Z. 2011. Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
Creswell. John.W. 2010. Research Design, Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Jakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Elaine. 2016. Problem Based Learning : An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Health Professions Education 2 (2016) 75–79. Science Direct.
Farhan, M. 2014. Keefektifan PBL dan IBL Ditinjau Dari Prestasi belajar Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dan Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal RisetPendidikan Matematika, Vol. 1 No. 2 November 2014.
Fauzi, Ahsan. 2018. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share(TPS) Dan Talking Stick Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Pada Kompetensi Dasar Memproses Buku Besar Siswa Kelas X Akuntansi 1 SMK 17 Magelang Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia Volume 7 Nomor 1 Tahun 2018
Gryka, R., Kiersma, M. E., Frame, T.R., Cailor, S.M. Chen, A.M.H. 2017. Comparion of Student Confidence and Perceptions of BiochemistryConcepts using a Team Based Learning Versus Traditional Lecture Based Format. Currents in PharmacyTeaching and Learning, 9 (2017) 302-310.
Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2015. A Contextual Game-Based Learning Appoach to Improving Students’. Computers & Education 81 (2015) 13e25. Science direct.
Heni, Dwi Nur. 2015. Pengembangan Perangkat pembelajaran Tematik Bervisi SETS Berkarakter Peduli Lingkungan. Journal of Primary Education 4 (1) (2015).
Huda, Miftahul. 2014. Cooperative Learning: Metode, Teknik, Struktur, dan Model Penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Husnul Chotimah. 2015. Penerapan strategi pembelajaran Think Pair Share untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar biologi siswa kelas X KPR 2 SMKN 13 kota Malang. Jurnal Biology Science & Education 2015. BIOLOGI SEL (vol 4 no 2 edisi jul-des 2015 issn 2252-858x.
Khaerunnisa, E. 2016. Keefektifan Pembelajaran Think Talk Write Berbantuan Alat Peraga Mandiri Terhadap Komunikasi Matematis dan Percaya Diri Siswa Kelas. Journal of Mathematics Education 5 (1) (2016)
L Surayya. 2014. Pengaruh model pembelajaran Think Pair Share terhadap Prestasi belajar IPA ditinjau dari keterampilan berfikir kritis siswa. e- Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA. Volume 4 Tahun 2014.
Mayasari, Tantri. 2016. Apakah Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Project Based Learning Mampu Melatihkan Keterampilan Abad 21?. JPFK, Vol. 2 No. 1, Maret 2016, hal 48 – 55
Putu Ayu, I Wayan, Ni Wayan. 2014. Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Media Cetak Terhadap Prestasi belajar IPS Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus V Mengwi. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.Jurusan PGSD (Vol: 2 No: 1 Tahun 2014)
Rachmawati, Dwi. 2015. Efektivitas Problem Based Learning (PBL) Pada Tema Bunyi Dan Pendengaran Berbantuan Alat Peraga Tiga Dimensi Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. USEJ 4 (3) (2015.
Salam, R. 2017. Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) untuk Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Diri dan Komunikasi Matematis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan INSANI. 20(2): 108- 116.
Sudjana, N. 2009. Penilaian Prestasi belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sulistiyoningsih, Titien,. Kartono. Mulyono. 2015. PBL Bernuansa Adiwiyata Dengan Blended Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan. UJMER 4 (2) (2015).
Valiant. 2017. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Prestasi belajar siswa pada pembelajaran praktik kelistrikan otomotif SMK di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi. Volume 6, No 1, Februari 2016 (111-120)
Wijanarko, A. G., Supardi, K. I., dan Marwoto, P. 2017. Keefektifan Model Project Based Learning Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Prestasi belajar IPA. Journal of Primary Education. 6(2): 120-125.
Yuliadi, Riza. 2016. Peningkatan Prestasi belajar IPS dan Solidaritas Siswa Dengan Model Kooperatif Think Pair Share(TPS). FITRA, Vol. 2, No. 1, Januari – Juni 2016 • p-ISSN 2442-725X • e-2621-7201
Published
2023-04-10
How to Cite
Ratna Pratiwi, S., Sumarno, & Andri Nugroho, A. (2023). STUDI KOMPARASI KEEFEKTIFAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN DAN SIKAP PEMECAHAN MASALAH PADA PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(1), 432 - 446. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i1.713