NILAI-NILAI DIDAKTIS DALAM SASTRA NUSANTARA: SASTRA SUNDA

  • Yana Suryana stkip subang
Keywords: didactic value, literary archipelago, sundanese literarature

Abstract

Education is a process of humanizing. The essence of education is to empower human  as individuals who is capable and intelligent in his life, nation and civilization pharmaceutics. Learning literature is a way that must be reached in the world of education as an expression of self, digging the character and make mode which arouse learner’s thinking. The literary work is a reflection and social upheaval in society, therefore the literary education hold an important role in changing  the mindset of people through the appreciation of literature. In the study of Archipelago Literature, in this case of the Sundanese Literature Poetry (pupujian), this study is to find the values didactic using structural and semiotic approach. The result of the analysis is found that Archipelago Literature: Sundanese Literature in the form of  poetry (pupujian) contains didactic values, like : a. religious value is  aspect of education that is religion that contains the wisdom of phenomenon, behavior, attitude, outlook and character. b. Moral value is aspect relating to attitudes, morals , manners and decency. c. Social value is aspect relating to the public or to pay attention the public interest

References

Ahmadi,Abu.2007. Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bressler, Charles E. 1999. Textual and Literary Criticism. Cambridge: University Press.
Berger. Peter. 2000. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.
Depdiknas. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Djoko Damono, Sapardi. 1979. Sosiologi Sastra: Sebuah Pengantar Ringkas. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Esten, Mursal. 1978. Kesusastraan Indonesia: Pengantar Teori dan Sejarah. Bandung: Angkasa.
Hasy, Fitryah.2009. Diktat Pengantar Teori Sastra.
Herlina. 1993. Nilai Didaktis dalam Puisi (Makalah)
Fiske, Jhon 1994. The Search for Literary Meaning. Fankfurt: herbert Lang.
http://id.shvoong.com/social-sciences/education/2120601-manfaat-pembelajaran-sastra.
Pradopo. 2012. Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rusyana, Yus. 1992. Payungsi Sastra: Pangajaran Sastra Sunda Pikeun Murid Sakola Lanjutan. Bandung: Rahmat Cijulang.
Semi, Atar. 2012. Metode Penelitian Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa
Semi, Atar. 2013. Kritik Sastra. Bandung: Angkasa.
Sobur, Alex. 2004. Semiotika. Jakarta Gramedia.
Sudjiman, Panuti. 1986. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Sugeng. 2011. Didaktis dalam Sastra. (Makalah).
Sugihastuti. 2007. Teori Apresiasi Sastra.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sumiyadi. 2005. Pengkajian Puisi: Analisis Romantik, Fenomenologis, Stilistik, dan Semiotik. Bandung: Pusat Studi Literasi, JPBSI,FPBS,UPI.
Sumiyadi. di poskan 20.36
Sumarjo, Jakob dan Saini KM. 1994. Antologi Kesusastraan. Jakarta Gramedia
Tirtarahardja, Umar. 2005. Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Tilaar. 2009. Pendidikan dan Kekuasaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Teeuw, A. 1997. Sastra dan Ilmu Sasta: Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Teeuw, A. 20012. Membaca dan Menilai Sasta: Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wellek, Rene dan Austin Waren. 1990. Teori Kesusastraan. Jakarta: PT Gramedi .
Zoest, Aart van. 1980. Fiksi dan Nonfiksi dalam Kajian Semiotik. Jakarta: Itermassa.
Published
2020-12-05